The way ahead

Naturally, people gets interested in investment when the stock market plunge hits the news on TV and newspapers. It's simply logical to deduce that when the mainstream media says the market has fallen by this much, it also means this is a good time to invest. In my opinion, this might be true. The best time to start from zero is always now. And if one has already started, consider progressively putting more spare cash to work.

The next question for investment newbies is what to buy? I hope to write about this in future.

However, for investors already knee deep or appropriately neck deep in the markets, this question is probably no longer relevant. He would already own a carefully constructed portfolio, whose formation is likely on the basis of the investor's view of having the best growth, income, value or undertaking of the most comfortable risk level he can stomach. Recently, I've read that for an investor who spends such great effort to curate the list of stocks/ETFs he owns now, he will spend doubly more to defend his investment decisions when needed to. It's quite hard to change how one invests.

Perhaps, a great portfolio value reset event like what we are facing now is a turning point to evaluate the way we buy, sell or sit pat. In deep losses, we can better reflect deeply. What could I have done? What can I do to change things for the better. Without a push factor like an unbearable capital loss, the inertial for any overhaul of our investment methodology could be simply too big. I too, suffer from the same resistance to change.

For seasoned investors, does your investment vehicle have a solid navigation plan to prepare for possibly treacherous waters ahead? Will you stay the course, update your forward trajectory or are you charting a new way ahead?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A rebound

An unexpected and quick rebound was staged by the STI. T he market came back alive with the index climbing up from the lows of 2200 levels to the 2500 levels last week. From another perspective, YTD returns went from -30% and recovered to -20%. This bounce returned 10% in 4 weeks as volatility receded. Did you catch the full range of returns? Maybe half of it? Or possibly much more? If you stayed the course and held tight without selling, you would have caught the full rebound. If you sold something during the plunge, you would have lost some returns presented by the turn in market direction. If you have bought on the way down, continuing at levels below 2600, you would have recouped more than 10% because your base cost was lowered when averaging down. No one knows if this market action is a dead cat bounce. It may or may not retest 2200 levels. It may go lower from here. The economy does feel bad with an extension of SG's circuit breaker, but the stock market is not pe
Read more

Market's disconnect

The word "disconnect" to describe the link between the market and the economy has been quite common nowadays. The stock market had ran in the opposite direction of the economy. It is an obvious conflict for any investor reading the current situation. On one hand, the world's greatest shutdown is still in progress. On the other hand, the market continues a vertical climb out of a hole it fell into. As most people believe, the market leads the economy. Meaning that if we translate the market action into a prediction of the future economy, we will be out of the woods within the next few months? Frankly, I am clueless. I'm not sure if anyone can answer this question confidently, given that there is no precedent of a virus like COVID-19 in the modern era. I always like to understand the market sentiment. Market sentiment is important because it gives us a perspective of the crowd's behavior, and how the crowd is moving is quite critical to investment decisions of succe
Read more

SG votes 2020

The SG 2020 election results are out. The outcome is a historic victory for the Worker's Party, claiming one SMC and two GRCs. In a certain way, this election might be considered as a "defeat" to the PAP. Popular vote fell closed to all time lows of nearing 60%. There is some soul searching to be done for the ruling party. As voters becomes more educated, the current ways of reaching out to them have not worked well. Top down approaches are definitely outdated. Advanced concepts like civil liberties are increasingly valued. There can be more patience, respect and opportunities for the opponents with the necessary qualities and calibre. The current dominant party system confers an advantage of pushing key policies that works, more efficiently. The disadvantage is the unchallenged nature of passing bills advantageous to perpetuate the system. As the country's democracy matures, perhaps the natural evolution is to lean towards having a two or multi-party system where by
Read more